Purdue University Calumet
Minutes
of
the Purdue University Calumet
Senate Meeting
of October 3, 2001
SFLC 321
PRESENT: Senators, D. Barbour, C. Barczyk, M. Cahn, K. Corey, V. Damusis, H. Daubek, T. Dougherty, A. Elmendorf, J. Hack, L. Hopp, N. Houshangi, M. Joyce, M. Longas, D. Niedner, B. Robinson, J. Russett, M. Ryan (Sergeant at Arms), S. Scachitti, D. Underwood-Gregg, E. Vockell, C. Winer, (Presiding Officer); Chancellor Cohen; Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Singer; and; Parliamentarian S. Lerner, SGA President C. Sizemore and Secretary A. Agosto-Severa.
ABSENT: Senators, R. Bennett, E. Bouktache, G. Barrow
GUESTS: Beth Pellicciotti, J. Allen Johnson, D. Steuer-Wagner
I.
Call to Order.
Call the
meeting to order.
II.
Approval of the Agenda.
The Agenda
was approved.
III. Approval
of the Minutes.
The minutes
of the September 2001 meeting were approved.
IV. Chancellor’s
Report.
The
Chancellor publicly thanked everyone on campus for what he felt was an
extraordinary community response to how we handled the terrorist attacks on the
11th of September and the aftermath of that tragedy. He stated that
he was especially proud of the initiative that the students took in organizing
the candlelight vigil and the fundraisers they have conducted to date.
The message is that we are part of a larger community and shows that
there is a lot of caring going on at Purdue Calumet.
He also addressed the university’s position in terms of the state budget. The
Chancellors of the regional campuses received a memorandum from the President
informing them that the governor has ordered a strategic hiring freeze and a
reduction of out of state travel by state agencies, in preparation for what
looks to be a billion dollar shortfall. The senior leadership of the campus will
be meeting this week to begin to identify ways to implement the President’s
request, and the President has made four requests of all the Chancellors. The
first request is that all vacant positions should receive high-level review
before approval to fill a position is granted. We may have the right to fill
positions but we will be looking at those positions very carefully. Also,
request for out of state travel will receive similar review and should be
approved only for very high priority purposes. We will set up a mechanism where
we can review out of state travel request. This is not to say there will be no
out of state travel, but there will be priorities set. Capital purchases should
be deferred, or if they can’t be deferred, limited to the most essential
items. So we will take a good look at what we were planning to do with Capital
this year, and that we should conserve our non-recurring balances. The
Chancellor was fairly optimistic that Purdue Calumet is in pretty good financial
shape. What we will need to do is to come up with a plan for how we would
isolate and return monies if we needed to do that. We understand that in order
to run an educational enterprise, we will have to spend some money, and we do
not expect that we will shortchange our students. So expect that we will be
staffing courses, and that will be our high priority. This may be a short-term
issue, it may be a longer- term issue, none of us are in a position to say right
now, we may loose some recurring funds or we may not, and that is again it is
too soon to tell. What is clear is that we must proceed with our Strategic
Planning; we must operate as if we have the funds to go ahead. So it is not our
intention to stop Strategic Planning, it is not our intention to hold off on the
things we can possibly do, and move forward as best as we can within the
financial realities. We will continue the plan; we will continue to operate as
if over the next three to five years we will implement our plan. So I’m hoping
that we’ll all adopt the attitude of being optimists and skeptics at the same
time and understand that from the skeptical side, we may not get all these
funds, but still act as optimists, and carry on and carry forward. So we won’t
be fooled and feel deflated if things don’t quite fall our way, but we won’t
have put our own handcuffs on.
Question: Chancellor Cohen was asked, “What is the anticipated duration of the
freeze—end of the calendar year, or fiscal year”? The Chancellor responded that this freeze is being driven by
the lack of revenues of the state and they are currently below their
projections. If revenues pick up,
then there is no reason to have the freeze. So we are the logical consequence of
that, and all state agencies and all programs that are funded by the state. So
if we’re in for a short recession, and then a turn around, it might not be a
big deal. If we’re in for a long recession, it could be a long time problem;
nobody knows the answer to that. What we do know is that our best hope is to do
the things that will help build the economy in the state and the region. We can
remind people that higher education is an investment not an expense. So that
when it comes time to cutting the state budget, and when it comes time to
conserve funds, he stated that we want to make the case, that higher education
needs to be seen as one of the mechanisms that the state will use to work its
way out of a recession.
V.
Report
of the Chair of the Senate.
The Chair
commented that not everyone had their Senate nameplates, even though they were
available at last month’s meeting. We are in the process of doing a search to
locate them.
Other items that have happened in the past month are: On
Friday, September 21st, the Chancellor, Becky Stankowski, J. Allen
Johnson, the new executive assistant to the Chancellor and I went to West
Lafayette. The Chancellor made his
presentation to the Board regarding our campus’ Strategic Plan. I made a
report to the Board that referenced the activities of our Senate and some of the
special activities that our faculty participated in after the September 11th
acts of terrorism. I’m pleased to report that no one had any questions of
either of us.
A second item deals with the request made by Maureen
Muha, the LASS Dean’s secretary, on a new effort to establish a memorial wall
in memory of those who lost their lives on September 11th.
The “wall” will be located in the SFLC. The purpose of this activity
is to raise funds for those families who were unfortunately left without family
members after the September 11th tragedy. I’ve indicated that
faculty are interested in pursuing a plan with them that would be something
meaningful and represent our concerns for those unfortunate families that are no
longer whole.
The Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs reminded everyone that the President would be joining the Chancellor next Wednesday for a reception for faculty and staff at 4:00pm at the Center. The President will provide a brief address, and it may address the state of the state.
VI. Special
Business of the Day.
Senate
Document 01-11. Revisions to governing tenure procedures.
Faculty Affairs Committee.
For Discussion.
T. Elmendorf introduced the two documents, which were approved by the Faculty Affairs Committee at their most recent meeting. The genesis, or at least partial genesis of these documents came from an initiative of the Teacher Education Advisory Council, which was asked to bring forward a proposal for promotion and tenure of faculty who hold joint appointments. The committee examined their document, and basically rejected it out of hand. They felt that the scope of the document was too narrow. And that would be ongoing possibility of the existence of joint appointments in between programs that didn’t necessarily include the School of Education. That we should draw a new document that would allow for such appointment without reference to the School of Education, and content provided departments so that such items could be dealt with on a systematic basis. Senate Document 01-11 is purely concerned with that kind of modification. The relevant change consists primarily of one sentence that reads, “In case of joint appointments, the administrative heads of each appointing academic unit shall provide for proportionate representation and participation congruent with the following provisions for single appointments.” The document proceeds as it has always done and was approved by this senate previously. So in those cases when a candidate with a joint appointment comes up to tenure, as governed by this document, that special committees, primary and area committees will be formed in a manner that is proportionate with the manner of the candidate’s appointment. The only other change to the tenure procedures document is to delete practically all references to departments from the document, and replace them with references to the academic unit, since some academic units forming primary committees are no longer considered departments but are rather schools. That concludes the discussion of document 01-11.
The motion to move the document for action was made
by Professor Damusis.
Seconded by Professor Robinson.
Motion approved.
Document PASSED.
Senate Document 01-12 Revisions to governing promotion procedures. Faculty Affairs Committee. For
Discussion.
This document deals with promotion procedures and was
motivated by the same considerations and the same sort of document put forward
by the Teacher Education Advisory Council. However, there is also an additional issue that is contained
within this document, namely, the possibility of removing the West Lafayette
administrators from Panel C. The
committee was generally in favor of this idea, but is waiting to hear the
results of a discussion between the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and the
Provost that was supposed to take place but has not yet occurred.
As with previous document, the committee inserted
language allowing for joint primary and area committees for the consideration
and promotion of candidates with joint appointments, and deleting the two West
Lafayette administrators from Panel C. The
references to departments have also been cleaned up.
The discussion will continue and the document will
come up at next months Senate meeting for approval.
Replacement
of Senate vacancies. Nominating
Committee. For Approval
The document was assigned number 01-13.
M. Ryan introduced the document and commented that
the changes to the existing document are a result of a few changes in Senators.
Professor Longas, replaces K. Rowberg, former representative from
Chemistry and Physics, we have Professor Bill Robinson replacing Tom Roach from
Communications.
Motion to approve document was made by Professor
Ryan. Seconded by Professor Dougherty.
Document PASSED.
Report of the Curriculum and Education Policy
Committee:
The following documents, which were posted, will be
considered.
|
EMS 01-50 |
New Course - EE 459 |
|
EMS 01-51 |
Change Corequisite - EE 202 |
|
EMS 01-71 |
Change Prerequisite - EE 301 |
|
EMS 01-72 |
Change in Prerequisite - EE 302 |
|
EMS 01-73 |
Change in Prerequisite - EE 311 |
|
EMS 01-74 |
Change in Prerequisite - EE 432 |
|
EMS 01-75 |
Change in Title & Description - EE 375 |
|
EMS 01-76 |
Change in Prerequisite - ENGR 380 |
|
EMS 01-77 |
Change in Prerequisite – ME 312 |
|
EMS 01-78 |
New Course CHM 255L |
|
EMS 01-79 |
New Course – CHM 256L |
|
EMS 01-81 |
New Minor - Minor in Mathematics |
|
EMS 01-82 |
New Course - EE 451 |
|
EMS 01-84 |
Change in Prerequisite - BIOL 213 |
|
EMS 01-85 |
New Minor - Minor in Applied Mathematics |
|
TECH-CC-01-02 |
Change in Pattern & Name - EET 110 |
|
TECH-CC-01-03 |
New Course – Change in Title, Description, Pattern, & Credit for EET 262 |
|
TECH-CC-01-04 |
New Course EET 296 |
The Chair called for approval of the document as
presented. Document PASSED.
VII. Unfinished
Business.
There was no
unfinished business.
VIII. Reports of
the Committees.
Agenda
Committee.
Academic
Support Services Committee.
No Report
Student Affairs
Committee.
T. Dougherty reported that they did not have a formal
meeting, but they do have a charge, and therefore he asked the committee members
to forward their schedules to him, so a meeting can be scheduled.
Curriculum
& Educational Policy Committee.
J. Russett reported that the committee met twice and dealt with the documents on today’s agenda. The committee is changing the curriculum template. The template should be easier to fill out, with directions that are literally in the document. This will ensure that the documents submitted are more complete and this will also help eliminate errors and problems.
Faculty Affairs
Committee.
T. Elmendorf
reported that the Faculty Affairs Committee met and approved the documents on
the agenda today.
Nominating Committee.
M. Ryan reported that they have not had a meeting but asked the members of the nominating committee to stay after today’s meeting.
Student
Government.
C. Sizemore reported that Purdue Calumet Student
Government has the following activities this week. There will be a charity concert on Friday, Alumni Hall.
It’s $5.00 for students and faculty with I.D’s, $7.00 for non-students and
members of the university community. If they bring a non-perishable item, it
will cost $5.00 to attend. He
encouraged everyone to come and show support. The event will be from 7PM to 1AM
and they will have seven (7) bands. The
money raised will also go to the New York and Washington tragedy and is a part
of the organization’s theme.
IX. Other
New Business.
None
X.
Adjournment.
The meeting
was adjourned at 4:20 PM.